Canon EF. etanche aux intempéries (résistant aux éclaboussures) Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM. Canon EF 16-35mm F2.8L III USM. L'appareil est protégé par des joints supplémentaires afin de prévenir les défaillances dues à la poussiÚre, les gouttes de pluie et les éclaboussures. Dispose d'une monture de métal.
Canon Ultrawide Lenses Compared (Full-Frame) Canon 20-35 USM, 20-35mm f/2.8 L, 17-40mm f/4 L and 16-35/2.8II. enlarge. Canon 20-35 USM, 20-35 L, 17-35mm, 17-40mm and 16-35mm L II. enlarge. Canon 20/2.8 USM, 17-40/4 L, 16-35/2.8 L II and 16-35/4 L IS. bigger. Canon Ultrawide Lens Sharpness Comparison.
The Canon RF 15-35 mm f/2.8 L IS USM has a 9-bladed diaphragm and holds the same number of lens elements as the EF 16-35 mm f/2.8 L USM: 16. The lens elements have Canonâs SWC and Air Sphere Coating, and the front element has an extra treatment so that moisture and dirt donât stick as well. The lens has a Nano-USM focusing motor.
Canon EF. weather-sealed (splashproof) Canon EF 16-35mm F2.8L III USM. Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Canon EF 16-35mm F2.8L III USM. Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2.
But, if an alternative is to be considered, the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Lens is my easy first choice. In the Sony vs. Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 Lens comparison (and mentally adjusting for the camera differences), I see the Canon turning in sharper corners at 16mm and slightly sharper corners at some of the longer focal lengths.
Not shown here, but the 10-18mm has the same or even less distortion as does the 16-35mm. Ha! I expect that the Canon 16-35mm f/4 L IS should be the first really sharp Canon full-frame ultrawide, but today, a $100 used Rebel with the new $300 10-18mm turns out images about as sharp as the $1,700 16-35mm f/2.8 L II and $3,200 5D Mark III. I just
SgUp. 29 55 243 41 351 135 278 156 178
canon ef 16 35mm f 2.8 l usm vs ii
